![remux vs hvec 10bit remux vs hvec 10bit](https://www.4kjy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1632010171-830d6382dfbf39d.jpg)
Then I would go for HEVC SDR 10bit, contra to HEVC SDR 8bit? That would yield the best quality in picture?įor video compression: So in theory, if I understand correct that is, HEVC is the best compression to go with? since it can compress the files better, and with a better quality in picture? The discs support both high dynamic range by increasing the color depth to 10-bit per color and a greater color gamut than supported by conventional Blu-ray video by using the Rec.
![remux vs hvec 10bit remux vs hvec 10bit](https://i.ibb.co/HtbTWGw/2.png)
Ultra HD Blu-ray supports 4K UHD (3840 × 2160 resolution) video at frame rates up to 60 frames per second, encoded using High Efficiency Video Coding. Ultra HD Blu-ray discs are incompatible with existing Blu-ray players. Ultra HD Blu-ray is a digital optical disc data storage format that supersedes Blu-ray. It's like comparing 3 cars on a classified ad. Your logic is based on comparing files based on alleged descriptions, with no regards for the original source, how the 3 files were produced. But even a cursory search on the terms would reveal that. Hevc and Avc are both in the MPEG family but Hevc is newer generation with greater features, complexity & efficiency. Why no naming of the title and chain of work to compare notes? Hate to say it but this smacks of warez/pirating. But don't quote me on that because I am quite dubious of all the choices and this approach in general. Either that's a typo or lying or stupidly-worded re-encode, as x265 is HEVC, and AVC would use something like x264.īy process of elimination and going by bitrate/efficiency/quality trends, I would expect - given that ALL other factors were equal and these are from the same source/provenance and of the same generation - that #1 should be best. #2 is suspect, because it says in the same phrase "x265" and "AVC". Only way this is legit is if this is a supplemental, ENHANCEMENT portion to its accompanying Sdr file. #3 is bogus: Hdr would never take up LESS that the same title in Sdr, probably double. and even smaller size for the same bitrate if you compare x265 wiith x264.
![remux vs hvec 10bit remux vs hvec 10bit](http://www.4kjy.com/wp-content/themes/ripro7.11/timthumb.php?src=http://www.4kjy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/1610767907-9143ad3b151df91.jpg)
if the rip and compression were done correctly then you'd expect good results. get a Screener or cam rip and pretend it is a bluray rip.Ĭompare this to a real lossless source like a an uncompressed bluray that you own.
#Remux vs hvec 10bit mp4#
these numbers won't matter if the original source is unknown.Īnyone can reencode a lossy mp4 and recreate those humungous FAKE files.but if the source is suspect quality will be as good as its source. If this argument is to compare material downloaded from the internet. PCs and more powerful mobile devices would be able to play those Not sure if Smart TVS like have 10 bit support.